Do you use natural language search or just keyword search?
| Wednesday 15th April 2009 05:06am 1 |

Patentest
66 Posts
|
This question is both specific for your search and general for
the industry.
Natural language is a technological concept in which a block of
text (natural text) is being examined for its content
automatically. A search is then conducted according to the
results of the examination.
Keyword search is breakdown of any concept or idea into a set of
keywords which are then used to perform a search in the existing
knowledge databases. The keyword breakdown is best performed by a
human who can apply logic to the process.
|
|
| Wednesday 15th April 2009 05:15am 2 |

Patentest
66 Posts
|
In general the concept of natural language search never really took
off. There were some tries and there are a few systems that still
claim to have such capability but it was never widely adopted by
the industry. No government database provides natural language
search capabilities and there is a need to relay on 3rd party sites
to perform the analysis from the block of natural text to a
searchable criterion.
Some IP professionals use natural search as a complimenting process
to the traditional keyword search.
Another key point to consider is that using natural language search
you are actually disclosing the new idea / patent to the search
engine because you need to provide a text block that accurately
describes it. Where is with keyword search the new idea / patent
are only exposed to the person extracting the keywords and are not
disclosed to any search engine, database or platform used to
perform the search.
Patentest does not use natural language search because A) We do not
expose our client’s confidential information to any 3rd party. B)
Natural language search technologies are not mature enough to give
better results.
|
|